Can we recognize yin yang as a dual force of innovation?
Scholars tell us that there are two natural complementary yet contradictory forces at work within our universe.
The Chinese call these ‘Yin Yang’. Yin is regarded as more passive, receptive, more outside-in, whereas Yang is more active, creative and inside-out. These are seemingly opposing forces but interconnected and interdependent; one gives rise to the other, they actually reinforce each other.
Yin & yang seemingly have the following characteristics: they are opposing yet equally rooted together; they have the power to transform each other and eventually are balanced out.
Yin Yang in Idea Management
As a good example of these opposite forces, we often are required to generate many different ideas and apply the countervailing need of selecting from among those that best can meet the organization’s objectives. It is critically important to have this ‘flow and balance’ and allow it to evolve constantly.
So by this example, we see that ’ Yin and Yang’ are both dynamic, sometimes opposing forces, constantly interacting with each other balancing conflicting needs (and aims) and recognizing that one determines the other and you need them both to strengthen innovation. We need these two opposing forces in all we do to manage the ideas for innovation. These often do conflict with one another in their needs and actions. Still, they both need to be in force to bring out all that is needed to be evaluated in the idea process, so real innovation occurs for ‘something new that gives additional value’.
This balancing of yin and yang needed in the above idea management example follows a constantly changing course, but there is also a natural order. Equally, though this seemingly is always within a constantly evolving innovation system that reflects the constant change around us.
We cannot get ‘fixed’ in our ways, and it is this constant flow that system engineers have often never fully understood within managing the innovation process. Often they want to separate the parts of the system, attempting to take out the ‘conflict’ innovation truly needs to have constantly.
Yin Yang in risk and opportunity
‘Risk and opportunity’ are yet another of those two opposites for the yin yang of innovation that also need that constant balance for innovation to thrive. We need to arrive at our own point of “chi” to balance these. To arrive at this balance, we should look for the right interactions between the two sides, for instance:
- Recognition that on each side of the coin (risk/opportunity) will enable better decisions
- You seize better opportunities with confidence if you can quantify the risks.
- Recognition of the two can help you allocate funds more wisely
- You achieve a better delivery on an improving scale of understanding both aspects
- You anticipate problems far earlier
Moving the organization from being risk-averse through experimental to seeking opportunities needs a constant force and attention. Managing its tension is essential to gain a greater innovation effect. Effective risk management depends equally on the good quality of information- the same as “seeing” opportunity; it simply needs a good framework that provides suitable scope for sensible risk-taking and exploring the opportunity.
Yin and Yang of Creativity
Being creative has both a yin and a yang aspect also. Creative people tend to be smart and quick yet naïve at the same time and need often reminding them of the whole system and how their ideas can or cannot fit into this. As we are aware, creativity needs a fun and relaxed environment yet a large measure of professionalism.
The need for an open brainstorming environment needs to be balanced with ensuring this is well-structured to capture the purpose of the brainstorming. We all have ‘unconscious skills’ that need stirring and awakening. We are often asked more often to connect all the often conflicting ‘pieces’ to see a new possibility or resolve a difficult problem.
Having different perspectives available that provide diversity opens up our minds yet equally allows for placing these random pieces into a new order.
So the ‘yin and yang’ are needed in the creative process of innovation. You need the two opposites of managing differences and harnessing diversity to be in conflict actively and equally complement each other to bring out better results.
Yin Yang for designing positive tension into innovation
Then we actually need to build a greater ‘tension’ into our innovation processes. Finding the balance or appropriateness to achieving innovation goals are not natural tensions; they need to be designed in. Within innovation, understanding the context is critical; it needs to be fully understood, equally coordinating the outcomes are critical as well. Both create tension and need to be explained.
Context gives us the purpose, the bounds, the outline in structures and capabilities, roles and commitments to achieve the result that is being required. The coordination is what leadership is concerned with, to keep bringing the parts back to the whole as the outcome needed. The pursuit of operational excellence is another example. It often becomes an end unto itself and gets somehow disconnected from the mission of generating growth and creating value.
So yin yang describes how polar or seemingly contrary forces are interconnected and interdependent, often in conflict but needing to be complementary opposites within a greater whole. Successfully managing the natural tensions should be viewed for innovation as not conflicts to be avoided but as opportunities to be managed and converted. This gives a greater coherence and consistency from ‘open’ participation and engagement.
Leadership has the role of getting the right balance, the right design tension into the innovating system, to bring out the best from this participation of all the opposing forces for greater innovation opportunity.
Recognizing yin yang evolves.
Finally, we also have to recognize evolution and, by extension, that innovation is constantly moving on. As the universe is changing every day, finding a common method to discover the unchanging rules in any activity is not easy. They all are constantly changing, and we must somehow recognize this in our appreciation of supporting innovation. The ‘fluidness’ in innovation makes it hard to manage.
How do you get the balance right in managing the innovation activity? It is not an easy one to solve and needs constant management and causes consistent concern. Looking at innovation differently, more adaptive in nature might help. The opposing forces of yin and yang are important to consider within this.
Recognizing the power of ‘yin yang for innovation’ can give you the order of things and how and why they relate to each other. Complementary and conflicting opposites contribute to a greater innovation understanding, but they need consistent attention to managing.
Who did say managing innovation was easy?
