We are in a world of re-calibrating our business, where to invest and who to partner with. Firstly we have to cut-away much of our existing approaches and thinking of how we organize and operate.
Opening our minds to the alternative of being in a collaborative network, sharing in value and worth.
Having a reliable network to plug into and exchange views in confidence and speedily is vitally important. Many of those advisors we relied upon for economic prediction, (banks, consultancies, think tanks, even prediction models) providing their advice was prevalent on stability. They are at present as much at sea deciphering future direction as the rest of us.
What you can revert too and draw in a better level of confidence and understanding comes from the value and worth of your own trusted network. Who we know, who we work with and trust is so valuable in these volatile times.
Building a new Interconnected Business Ecosystem Design
I have recently been reworking my views on Business Ecosystems in their thinking and design. They are recognizing a fundamental shift in how we approach problem-solving and value creation. We need to continue to urge businesses to move away from often isolated, linear models towards this thinking and design, forming around being interconnected, based on dynamic systems.
It is moving towards a collaborative, interconnected design that makes for a radically different mindset where complex relationships, where value co-creation and balancing both short-term and long-term become central for sustainability and protecting a viable future.
We do need to recognize Business is on a Burning Platform: Why Traditional Approaches Are Failing
Building Ecosystem Business Models for Mid-Sized Firms are so often under-looked in much of the literature we are referred too. We get caught in the bigger players, often provided by the large consultant companies, for our references- such as Alibaba, Salesforce, Amazon, Apple, Siemens, etc,.
How can Mid-sized Business Organizations set about to build out an Ecosystem Business Model using third party providers for platforms, communication technology, data analysis and use of Gen AI?
Are these as expensive as initially feared, can they work as effectively as those provided for the bigger players offering Ecosystem solutions? You need to build out a projection of possible budgets for costs in the first year and then annual ongoing ones. Ecosystem building often runs into sometimes hundred of millions of dollars but taking a really small step I (really) hesitate here, but $2.0m to $3.0m for the first year to eighteen months provides you your dedicated Ecosystem, and yearly $1m, including team costs BUT it so depends. It is where you take this, in recognizing its value, diversity to your business and worth, determines where you take this out.
So please take these numbers as only a starters point to get your levels of interest up or otherwise I recommend you don’t bother to read the rest of the post! Scaling, then the numbers rise fast but so can the accelerated returns!
This is only a brief guidance to get you to relate and see if the “ecosystem juices” are flowing. It is not comprehensive but it does go into a starting point of a Mid-sized firms starting point to Business Ecosystems. Even if I hear some readers mutter these numbers are crazily low you have a initial framework to build up into a project
I want to here address a number of questions any organization contemplating this building a ecosystem would need to go through. There are a good few more but lets limit this to a level where they can be absorbed and then I suggest to go further then come and ask me.
When we are conceptualizing organization structures and relationships in Ecosystem thinking and design we often begin by attempting to relate this to Natural Ecosystems. We often miss the connections, perhaps this might help
Traditional business frameworks often get caught in mechanistic metaphors but natural ecosystem perspectives need a fundamentally different mindset. Why?
+Recognizing no business exists in isolation but in growing complex webs of relationships and dependencies
+ We need greater adaptation over rigid planning, we need to think continuous evolution and response change
+ Today we need to recognize we gain increasing value and insights from emergent outcomes, where the dynamic interactions within the system are more impactful that top-down directives
+ We are recognizing system dynamics have cascading effects, often indirect consequences and diversity of networks need to be considered to build resilient systems
So we need to often re-frame through natural ecosystem lens.
The need is to recognize that Business Ecosystems do need to be distinctive to succeed. They are complex and challenge much of what and how we undergo Business today.
Business Ecosystems do matter. Briefly they can transform the linear value chains we have in place today and make them more dynamic value networks. By expanding beyond existing and our traditional borders and markets we can create those potentially exponential growth opportunities. We can provide enhanced and highly interconnected customer value and through the selection of partners within the Ecosystem network we can can build real, sustaining competitive advantage.
Comparing Operating Models to change to Business Ecosystems
Forget how you operate in traditional business models if you are considering the value and benefits of applying Ecosystem thinking and designs. You really have to think radically differently.
There are significant differences in how we (can) operate and appreciate the distinctive aspects between our traditional management approach and applying Ecosystem thinking and design. Initial assessments are highly valuable before you embark on participating in Ecosystem collaborations.
There are several emerging frameworks that provide for both universal and distinct application stages. There is always a need to emphasis “contextual nuances” and those “triggering points” but those are further critical aspects to explain for gaining a deeper understanding of Business Ecosystem distinctiveness in future posts.
My aim is to encourage business thinking around Collaborative Ecosystem Management for the future. Considering and then undertaking Business Ecosystems has a very different organizational impact and significant changes to be considered to be built and then put into place.
One exercise I recently undertook was to compare traditional to ecosystem distinctiveness. I offer here ten key distinctive areas for comparison. Let me share these:
There are many aspects to evaluate. Here I provide a handy comparison of existing and necessary changes likely to be made for Ecosystem management. Take a look at many of the principle differences.
I have put these into ease-of-reference set of tables.
Dynamism and Knowledge are essential to your future
In today’s business landscape, where change is the only constant, businesses that can adapt quickly and effectively will be the ones that thrive through active dynamism. Dynamic ecosystems provide a framework for businesses to do just that
To make an Innovation or Business Ecosystem dynamic, interconnected, and capable of engaging a diverse group that drives innovation and business tasked with creating real impact and value, any business ecosystem should include the following key elements:
Feeling trapped, break out of the box with Innovation Ecosystems
We continue to fail to unlock the full potential of innovation. I continue to receive reports on the latest surveys on the management of open innovation and its progress.
So little is said or discussed on changing the innovation system, it seems organizations are (really) comfortable with incremental or experimental innovation as the extent of their ambition. We are trapped in a ever decreasing cycle.
I recall one report mentioning only 7% of innovation is deemed radical or significantly changing the way business undertakes innovation.
The business model, built on the premise the knowledge needs to flow into “us” and not mutually sharing the final outcomes, going into the market. Why?
In my view, Innovation Ecosystems Outperforms Traditional Internal Innovation Structures? Why don’t we change?
Integrated Blueprint Framework for Business Ecosystem Design and Thinking
So why do we need a Blueprint for thinking through the Business Ecosystem needs of future business?
A blueprint is needed to thrive and find solutions in the face of complexity and uncertainty.
Ecosystem thinking and design should be central to this blueprint, as it offers the potential for transformative power and new impact, value, and growth.
The integration of business ecosystems needs the interconnected parts, with each layer contributing to the whole.
The three main layers are Strategic, Operational and Crosscutting in design and building blocks
The need is to move towards a more comprehensive understanding of the values of synergies, interdependencies, and exponential value created when these layers are interconnected.
We need to appreciate the real business ecosystems we need, they are radically different than most of how we presently undertake Business.
What we first need to do is appreciate this significant difference of what are Business Ecosystems BEFORE we jump into chasing different growth, impact or business opportunity. It needs to recognize the most likely outcome is likely to be a new collaborative Business Model and ask “are we ready for that?”
The Story of Dynamic Ecosystems- the adaptive core
I am offering a different perspective here, one that explores dynamic ecosystems as a transformative organizational model. Sit back and listen.
I asked Google Notebook LM to look at one of my articles: “A fresh perspective of Dynamic Ecosystems”.
Expanding on the idea of Dynamic Ecosystems as the decision-making and adaptability core of business ecosystems involves positioning them as both the “intelligence layer” and the “adaptive engine” that powers business agility, resilience, and growth. This approach redefines their role from a passive network to a responsive, intelligence-driven hub that continuously senses, learns, and guides the ecosystem.
