<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>sharing in innovation design - Building Your Innovation &amp; Ecosystem Intelligence</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thinking4innovators.com/tag/sharing-in-innovation-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thinking4innovators.com</link>
	<description>This is a full archive mirror; for current work on Ecosystems and Innovation Visit [Agility/P4I/E4I]&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:25:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">192475262</site>	<item>
		<title>Sorting through our Innovation Management Tools</title>
		<link>https://thinking4innovators.com/sorting-through-our-innovation-management-tools/</link>
					<comments>https://thinking4innovators.com/sorting-through-our-innovation-management-tools/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[@paul4innovating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Achieving innovation engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advancing innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Building Innovation Capability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaining innovation momentum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation execution delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leading innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shifting dynamics in innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building better innovation tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deeper innovation understanding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defining deliverables for innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exporting knowledge and innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation Structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation toolkit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge for innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharing in innovation design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools and Methods for Innovation Management]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paul4innovating.com/?p=11886</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We all are caught up in handling and understanding different management tools. The numbers are accelerating, and if anything it&#8217;s adding more confusion to the pile we already have. So let’s see if we can help here, step back a little from your favourite tool and look at this just a little more deeply. How &#8230; <a href="https://thinking4innovators.com/sorting-through-our-innovation-management-tools/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Sorting through our Innovation Management Tools"</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thinking4innovators.com/sorting-through-our-innovation-management-tools/">Sorting through our Innovation Management Tools</a> first appeared on <a href="https://thinking4innovators.com">Building Your Innovation & Ecosystem Intelligence</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="section post-body"><img data-recalc-dims="1" fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignleft" src="https://i0.wp.com/cdn2.hubspot.net/hub/314186/hubfs/Blog/blind-medium.png?resize=392%2C285" alt="" width="392" height="285" /><br />
We all are caught up in handling and understanding different management tools.</div>
<div></div>
<div class="section post-body">The numbers are accelerating, and if anything it&#8217;s adding more confusion to the pile we already have. So let’s see if we can help here, step back a little from your favourite tool and look at this just a little more deeply.</div>
<div></div>
<div class="section post-body"><strong>How do we pick through all the tools, let alone keep up with all the new ones emerging?</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div class="section post-body">There are management tools that have become ‘enshrined’ in organizations and many of the executives become settled on the ones they have bothered to learn or seemingly do the job.<span id="more-11886"></span> The problem we are having, many of the traditional tools, many still taught in most management schools are lagging in the changing market we are operating in. Equally, there is such a growing movement on adopting new tools, many still in that lovely excuse of “being in Beta” that it does become confusing.</div>
<div class="section post-body">
<strong>Tracking the trends in Management Tools</strong><br />
One of the consulting companies, Bain &amp; Co has conducted the Bain’s Management Tools &amp; Trends survey since 1993. The latest one for <a href="http://www.bain.com/publications/articles/management-tools-and-trends-2015.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2015 is here</a>. They have made 15 surveys over the years and reported on the top 25 tools of each year. To be included they have to be relevant to senior management, topical and measurable.</div>
<div></div>
<div class="section post-body">The intent of this survey is to track what is ‘trending’, under what circumstances is it being used and how satisfied managers are with the results. It also helps provide better choices in selecting, implementing and integrating the different tools so as to hopefully improve an organization&#8217;s performance. Finally, when Bain conducts this survey they gather the opinions on a range of business issues and report the changing management priorities.</div>
<div class="section post-body">
I have followed this for a number of years and yet I am constantly surprised how little this seems to have really changed or the tools used, yet we have such a groundswell of management tool makers or so we believe.  If we want to get top management to change <em>their</em> beloved tools I feel it might take a different generation to sweep away the old guard and bring in the new.</div>
<div class="section post-body">
<strong>Yet there are signs of tool management change</strong></div>
<div class="section post-body">
One company pioneering a change in tools is <a href="https://strategyzer.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Strategyzer</a> founded by <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Osterwalder" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Alex Osterwalder</a> of Business Model Canvas fame. They are working towards a Strategyzer’s Toolbox of useful Business Tools.</div>
<div class="section post-body">
They are positioning themselves on a mission to find the right remedy for designing future growth engines by wanting to fill that gap by creating a set of tools for business strategy, business design and innovation. Each one of them focuses on solving a specific business problem. I feel they have a long way to go but are certainly on a promising road.</div>
<div class="section post-body">
For Strategyzer they define a business tool through Alex Osterwalder’s  definition:<br />
<em>’Business Tools’ are conceptual frameworks that are specifically designed to help business practitioners solve a concrete (and limited) business problem in a real-world context. The best tools are conceptually sound, simple, practical, visual, have a great user interface (UI) and provide a great user experience (UX). It is these characteristics that make them ‘fit’ for the real world and increases adoption by business practitioners.</em></div>
<div class="section post-body">
According to Strategyzer, Business Tools help strategists address today’s complex challenges in two ways: by providing a structured approach and a shared language.</div>
<div></div>
<div class="section post-body">
<ul>
<li><strong>Structured approach</strong>: tools frame strategic conversations and ensure all the important aspects of a problem are being addressed. They help organize information and prioritize the work.</li>
<li><strong>Shared language</strong>: tools align teams around a visual concept, making complex ideas clearer with an image.</li>
</ul>
<p>In Strategyzer’s view, there is clearly a gap between the tools a company uses to execute a known business model and the tools they use to design future growth engines.</p>
<p><strong>Returning to Bain’s advice might help us work through the tool ‘desire and need’.</strong></p>
<p>As companies seek to grow and innovate in an era of rapid technological change, they offer the following four suggestions based on their research to help managers get the most out of the tools they choose.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Get the facts</strong>: Every tool has strengths and weaknesses. And tools’ usefulness can change over time. To succeed, companies need to understand the full effects of each tool and then combine the right ones in the right ways at the right times. Peruse the research and talk to other tool users. Don’t naively accept hyperbole and simplistic solutions.</li>
<li><strong>Champion enduring strategies, not fleeting fads</strong>: Line managers and tool experts don’t always have perfectly aligned agendas. Tool experts may have an engaging perspective, but managers must manage. Companies should champion realistic strategic directions and view tools as an aide, not a panacea.</li>
<li><strong>Choose the best tools for the job</strong>: Managers should take a rational approach to selecting and implement tools. A tool will only improve results to the extent that it identifies customers’ unmet needs, builds distinctive capabilities, exploits competitor vulnerabilities and develops breakthrough strategies.</li>
<li><strong>Adapt tools to your business system—not vice versa</strong>. Bain&#8217;s research shows, for example, that major efforts achieve significantly better satisfaction scores than limited ones. If management can only engage in a limited effort, it may be best to avoid using some tools. It’s also important to keep in mind that satisfaction scores for the same tool can vary widely depending on company size and region.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Bain also offers some further important insights</strong><br />
Over time, Bain’s research has provided a number of important insights. Among them:</p>
<ul>
<li>Overall satisfaction with tools is moderately positive, but the rates of usage, ease of implementation, effectiveness, strengths and weaknesses vary widely</li>
<li>Management tools are much more effective when they are part of a major organization effort (critical point this)</li>
<li>Managers who bounce randomly from tool to tool undermine employees’ confidence</li>
<li>The hyperbole surrounding the trendiest of tools often leads to unrealistic expectations and disappointing results (chasing ‘Beta’ tools needs a possible cautious approach)</li>
<li>Decision-makers achieve better results by championing realistic strategies and viewing tools simply as a means to a strategic goal</li>
<li>No tool is a cure-all</li>
<li>Surprisingly globally, the trend toward using fewer tools continues, (which is in exact opposite of what I would have thought)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Then we get into Tool Usage Trends</strong><br />
Companies seem to be deploying a wide and ever-shifting array of management tools, to address business challenges and capture business opportunities. The number of adopted tools is partly determined by the organization&#8217;s size, its needs and its abilities to really apply the tools and get these well used in their company.</p>
<p>The size of the management effort is critical to determining tool satisfaction.  The more they use the tool, and give emphasis to it, the more it seems to give satisfaction in capturing and delivering on the tool’s design.</p>
<p>Clearly, the importance of implementing tools across the organization needs top-down support and consistent use.</p>
<p>Presently the highest rated tool is Big Data Analytics; more than half of surveyed executives say that Advanced Analytics are transforming their marketing strategy.</p>
<p>Complexity Management was not a highly used tool even though increasing complexity was identified as one of the most pressing business challenges.<br />
<img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" title="" src="https://i0.wp.com/cdn2.hubspot.net/hub/314186/hubfs/Blog/major_effort_score_table.png?resize=618%2C442" alt="" width="618" height="442" /><br />
<strong>Putting real concerted effort into your chosen tool ‘delivers’ corporate satisfaction</strong></p>
<p>In the above table, you can see different tools vary in their level of satisfaction based on the level of effort put into their implementation. Big Data for instance scores a 4.22 in satisfaction from increased effort and falls to 3.65 with limited effort. Innovation labs show similar variation (4.22 vs. 3.70). Digital transformations have the potential to go very badly, with a score of 4.17 for highly active efforts and 3.52 for low effort operations.</p>
<p><strong>Sorting through the tools need real knowledge of their value and contribution</strong></p>
<p>We also have to remember that the tools you select often have differences in their focus, is it more on revenue growth or cost-cutting, on innovation or customer relationships for example. This may be one reason for the increasing popularity of Big Data Analytics at present, which is helping companies more effectively segment and target customers as currently, companies are looking for greater growth.</p>
<p>Established market firms continue to lean toward using more traditional tools such as Benchmarking, still, the Balanced Scorecard and Employee Engagement Surveys are extensively used, even though these might come in different guises of simple to complex scorecards, dashboards or KPI initiatives, with lots of traffic lights and directional arrows ‘enhancing’ these.</p>
<p><strong>Finally, one tool that is being put into place in the APAC region has for me a really high interest.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Disruptive Innovation Labs</strong><br />
On the 2015 list of Bain&#8217;s is Disruptive Innovation Labs. These foster disruptive innovations—high-risk, high-return breakthroughs that often start at the bottom of a market but eventually displace established competitors.</p>
<p><em>So What do Disruptive Innovation Labs do?</em></p>
<p>Disruptive innovations require different time frames, processes, performance metrics, people and skills than incremental (or “sustaining”) innovations. The evidence shows that Disruptive Innovation Labs work better when separated from core business operations.</p>
<p>Primary benefits of separation include the ability to acquire and retain exceptional talent, work within specialized facilities, offer a higher level of Freedom to challenge conventional wisdom, look to reduced bureaucracy and increased flexibility and offer more entrepreneurial cultures and incentives to build the culture to seek disruption.</p>
<p><em>Companies are using Disruptive Innovation Labs in different ways:</em><br />
Research also shows that Disruptive Innovation Labs benefit from “soft integration” methods, such as social integration of senior teams, job rotations, collaborative planning, shared knowledge networks, and cross-functional teams and task forces.</p>
<p>These methods help to focus the lab’s efforts on real-world problems. They also reduce conflict, leverage existing assets and economies of scale, and encourage the adoption and deployment of breakthroughs.</p>
<p>Most management teams aspire to innovation “ambidexterity”—the ability to fully exploit existing assets while simultaneously exploring new capabilities required for future success.</p>
<p>Disruptive Innovation Labs push organizations beyond incremental improvements. They are often deployed in three situations:</p>
<ul>
<li>When companies face new forms of competition that are stealing market share or reducing profitability</li>
<li>When traditional innovation methods are failing to deliver the required results</li>
<li>When management senses that the organization is growing complacent and needs concrete examples of bold innovations to raise its vision and transform the culture</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>So how aware of this specific trend in disruptive labs were you? </strong></p>
<p>It is presently not trending very highly in Europe or North America and that must give many companies one or two alarm bells around innovation. It would be.</p>
<p>So if you would like to explore more the Management tool and trends survey for 2015 by Bain and Co here is a <a href="http://www.bain.com/publications/articles/management-tools-and-trends-2015.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener">further link</a>.</p>
<p>Tools and trends are certainly just piling up, have you established your toolkit yet? Time to take a deeper look at all that pile.</p>
</div>
<p>*********<br />
<strong>Publishing note</strong>:  This blog post was originally written on behalf of <a href="http://hypeinnovation.com/">Hype</a> and with their permission, I have this added to my own site</p><p>The post <a href="https://thinking4innovators.com/sorting-through-our-innovation-management-tools/">Sorting through our Innovation Management Tools</a> first appeared on <a href="https://thinking4innovators.com">Building Your Innovation & Ecosystem Intelligence</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinking4innovators.com/sorting-through-our-innovation-management-tools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">11886</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The essential innovation vision</title>
		<link>https://thinking4innovators.com/the-essential-innovation-vision/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[@paul4innovating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 09:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Achieving innovation engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advancing innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amplifying the innovation signal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Building Innovation Capability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foster Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaining innovation momentum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation execution delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrated Innovation Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leading innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shifting dynamics in innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tackling innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[designing innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[designing tension into innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharing in innovation design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the challenges of innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vision challenges for innovation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paul4innovating.com/?p=3118</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In a recent leadership study on innovation by Capgemini Consulting, one of the study&#8217;s top-line concerns was the lack of a well-articulated innovation strategy, and then beyond this, a lack of organizational understanding of the linkages required. It is amazing how many organizations lack a clear innovation vision and an explicit set of statements from &#8230; <a href="https://thinking4innovators.com/the-essential-innovation-vision/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The essential innovation vision"</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thinking4innovators.com/the-essential-innovation-vision/">The essential innovation vision</a> first appeared on <a href="https://thinking4innovators.com">Building Your Innovation & Ecosystem Intelligence</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent leadership study on innovation by Capgemini Consulting, one of the study&#8217;s top-line concerns was the lack of a well-articulated innovation strategy, and then beyond this, a lack of organizational understanding of the linkages required.</p>
<p>It is amazing how many organizations lack a clear innovation vision and an explicit set of statements from the Chief Executive or their designated C-Level Officer on innovation.</p>
<p><strong>One great visual paints a thousand words</strong><br />
This visual I came across some years back, and for me, it is outstanding in providing the feedback loops that go into developing the right innovation vision.</p>
<p>To get to a definitive endpoint of having an innovation vision you are faced with some complex challenges. These are well shown here. <span id="more-3118"></span><br />
Each influences the other and constantly loop back, making hopefully an improving vision success.</p>
<figure id="attachment_3122" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-3122" style="width: 640px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://paul4innovating.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/critical-need-of-a-ceo-vision1.png"><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-3122" title="Critical feedback needs of a CEO vision" src="https://paul4innovating.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/critical-need-of-a-ceo-vision1.png?resize=640%2C481" alt="" width="640" height="481" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/thinking4innovators.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/critical-need-of-a-ceo-vision1.png?w=866&amp;ssl=1 866w, https://i0.wp.com/thinking4innovators.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/critical-need-of-a-ceo-vision1.png?resize=300%2C226&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/thinking4innovators.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/critical-need-of-a-ceo-vision1.png?resize=768%2C577&amp;ssl=1 768w" sizes="(max-width: 709px) 85vw, (max-width: 909px) 67vw, (max-width: 984px) 61vw, (max-width: 1362px) 45vw, 600px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-3122" class="wp-caption-text">The critical feedback needs for constructing an innovation vision</figcaption></figure>
<p>The different challenges seen in this terrific depiction, provide the sort of dialogue and efforts that needs to go into ‘crafting’ the innovation vision. It is hard, thoughtful work. Lets look at each of these a little more.</p>
<p><strong>The Time Challenge</strong></p>
<p>We get caught in annual planning cycles that often leave little time for ‘considered’ opinion and debate. The annual plans all come in a deluge and this is plainly wrong. Creating a vision needs a lot of time to consider all the aspects. The ‘time gap’ seriously impacts the visions success and clarity of purpose</p>
<p><strong>The Diversity Challenge</strong><br />
Not only within the same board room do you have a diversity of opinion, you have that up and down any organization. Getting the views first out in the open, then managing the conflicting aspects and dealing with the ‘polarization effects’ all is difficult.</p>
<p>This is where a dedicated focus, a Chief Innovation Officer, can really make a difference. To get people to talk about the vision, what it should stand for, what needs to happen leads eventually to a greater clarity.</p>
<p><strong>The Relationship Challenge</strong><br />
Managing the relationships both within and outside the organization when it comes to the right thinking on innovation is hard, converting doubters, drawing out differences, improving the quality of any conversations around innovation (ideally with facts not conjecture) and raising the enthusiasm to engage is crucial to moving towards the right vision</p>
<p><strong>The Vision Cap Challenge</strong><br />
There is a reality to what and where you are and the perceived gap that need addressing honestly. This  is something we tend to be very poor at, is, holding a &#8216;creative&#8217; tension that can stimulate and create a vibrant and exciting innovation vision.</p>
<p>We try to dampen the divergence in opinions far too early so we can (quickly) got to convergence. This ‘keenness’ to take away the ‘creative’ tension tends to replace it with potential set of ‘destructive’ ones and this often creates much of the beginnings of the barriers to innovation. People resent not being well listened too or allowed time to develop their arguments.</p>
<p><strong>The Vision and its Success</strong><br />
If you get people to ‘freely’ talk about innovation, its importance, its impact and can ‘paint’ the future in broad brush strokes, they achieve a growing clarity and enthusiasm and that often missing critical component a sense of shared identity.</p>
<p>Innovation is complex; it deals with formal and informal mechanisms.</p>
<p>There is an awful lot to constructing a solid innovation vision but believe me, it is even harder to understand the right components that make up the innovation strategy, so it does eventually become a well-articulated innovation strategy.</p>
<p>More on this to come at a later date.</p><p>The post <a href="https://thinking4innovators.com/the-essential-innovation-vision/">The essential innovation vision</a> first appeared on <a href="https://thinking4innovators.com">Building Your Innovation & Ecosystem Intelligence</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3118</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A No Better Moment</title>
		<link>https://thinking4innovators.com/a-no-better-moment/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[@paul4innovating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 10:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Achieving innovation engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advancing innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amplifying the innovation signal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Building Innovation Capability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fresh thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaining innovation momentum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation execution delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrated Innovation Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leading innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Molecules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shifting dynamics in innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tackling innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alignment of Strategy and Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business model canvas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common lanaguage for innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation and learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation pathway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharing in innovation design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the essence of innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Spring movement]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paul4innovating.com/?p=2949</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When you have some sun on your back after a long period of those winter months, you just always begin to feel life is so much better going forward. Life seems to reawaken within. I often wish we could capture the ‘sense’ of spring and what it promises to bring from this change of season. &#8230; <a href="https://thinking4innovators.com/a-no-better-moment/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "A No Better Moment"</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thinking4innovators.com/a-no-better-moment/">A No Better Moment</a> first appeared on <a href="https://thinking4innovators.com">Building Your Innovation & Ecosystem Intelligence</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you have some sun on your back after a long period of those winter months, you just always begin to feel life is so much better going forward.</p>
<p>Life seems to reawaken within. I often wish we could capture the ‘sense’ of spring and what it promises to bring from this change of season. Those of us who witness the change of seasons are so lucky.</p>
<p>I’ve also been reminded recently about the phrase offered by a number of leaders to explain a positive encouraging shift after a tough time, it goes like this: “<em>we do see some green shoots that are offering some early signs of growth and recovery.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Spring captures that growth moment. It is often talking to us of renewal. Innovation needs that capturing opportunity as well.</p>
<p><strong>Freezing the moment to listen</strong><span id="more-2949"></span><br />
Tell me why are we so notoriously bad at not learning from our past downturns? We still fail to talk to each other, to spend the time to reflect, to learn, to adjust, and too observe. So much is “brushed under the carpet.”</p>
<p>We still can’t find a common language of understanding within organizations, or dealing across organizations. We just simply end up spending a ridiculously large part of our time “talking at each other, or across each other” We lose so much time, energy and opportunity.</p>
<p><strong>We are simply losing so much time in the innovation debates</strong><br />
Innovation is challenging, it is complex, yet we chose to ignore so much of what is available to us to ‘spot’ new possibilities, resolve those unmet needs or improve on what is offered to help in our daily needs.</p>
<p>There is no better moment than to stop and rediscover how to listen, to truly listen. Just stop for one minute. Innovation is calling for a common language, a common understanding yet all I hear is the consistent throb of different views, making it difficult to interpret what is right, what is wrong.</p>
<p>With there being so much conflicting advice being offered in this innovation space we ‘freeze’; regretfully not for the right reason, to enjoy the moment, to learn from it, to take something positive away to improve our lives but more than often we become even more unsure and stop listening.</p>
<p>We shut out many of the sounds because they conflict, they are jarring and not as they should be, in harmony.</p>
<p><strong>The search for a common language</strong><br />
I’ve argued, as have others, we need to find a common language for innovation. Alexander Osterwalder in his opening to his concept of the Business Model Canvas always starts by posing the question on Business Models “We lack a common language” as everyone see’s the business model differently, if at all.</p>
<p>The brilliance within his canvas approach is that it offers a unique way to bring everyone onto the same page. We need to do this across more of innovation’s activities- to bring everyone on the same page.</p>
<p>I see the canvas approach taking hold in many different ways. I’ve read about the Enterprise Canvas, the Business Architecture Canvas, the Lean Canvas, and recently the Business Case Canvas.</p>
<p>I watch with growing interest the approach taken by Paidi O’Reilly, along with some of his colleagues in Ireland, who are presently working on the development of their view of an Innovation modelling software tool. It offers up at its heart, an Innovation Model Canvas, for moving from generation to commercialization.</p>
<p>I’d come up one level on what I’ve seen and read of Paidi’s work and argue we need an Innovation Structure Canvas as well. One that articulates the innovation environment we would wish to operate within. Something that ‘frame’s’ innovation from that firms perspective so we can keep going back to this overarching ‘innovation canvas’ to confirm and test where we are going to see if we are achieving the climate and environment we agreed .</p>
<p><strong>We also need to combine forces</strong></p>
<p>If we could learn to capture,  articulate and explore what we want to achieve on this &#8220;Innovation Structure Canvas&#8221; we can really begin to talk to others in a shared language. Open innovation, collaborative innovation is fraught with misunderstanding. Whenever we engage with others we must work hard at overcoming differences of opinion, if we want to engage them in <em>our</em> venture.</p>
<p>Structuring our conversations firstly around this canvas perhaps is a good way to test and validate what is in there, shown on this one page canvas so we can gain far more quickly from the other person’s reaction in smarter ways. They can identify or challenge what we want to achieve and we all can achieve and go to a deeper level of conversation by sharing this common starting point.</p>
<p>Steve Blank argues we all need to get out of the office more and test our hypothesis. Innovation is uncertain, it is often made up of guesses and hunches, of sparks of ideas and the more we can ‘show’ its potential value, the more others can relate and improve on that concept. Steve has a customer development process based on two distinct parts- search and execution.Creating a right environment for innovation is made up of a constant <em>ongoing</em> search and execution also.</p>
<p>Business the world over is in search of growth, more today than for a long time. We are ‘emerging’ from a severe downturn, a shock to the world’s economies and one thing recently struck me as a gap to fill, to build a bridge across a divide.</p>
<p><strong>Seeking each other out</strong></p>
<p>Large organizations are desperately searching for ways to change, to adapt to the new circumstances and challenges happening. The problem for many is they simply don’t know how too, the more they try, the more it seems complex. They often lack the real courage to rip up the existing business model and all that supports it. They presently are searching for the how too so as to navigate in these choppy waters of change.</p>
<p>Small organizations are seemingly more nimble, less burdened with heritage, legacy, superstructures that weigh you down and they can see so many breaking opportunities on where change is happening. They are closer to the ground from &#8216;seeing it&#8217; to &#8216;reacting to it&#8217; quickly but so often get held back for the lack of the very resources large organizations have, often in abundance, to mobilize and capitalize <em>once</em> they are set on a course.</p>
<p>Now is a good time for both large and small to find their ‘complementaries’, to recognize that have value even more to collaborate together. The large organization might have to moderate it ‘predatory’ behaviour though, the small organization’s fear of ‘David and Goliath’ and worried their ‘single shot’ is not going to make the mark does need careful and consideration in managing.</p>
<p>They both need to find new ways to combine, so the ones that have resources work with the ones that have the ‘sharper’ pulse of seeing opportunity, and this combination of ‘creative juices’ and ‘appropriate resource and energy’ are combined for mutual gain far more in collaborative, mutually sharing ways.</p>
<p>Not in the old ways of simply &#8216;acquisition&#8217; that so often tended to destroy the very entrepreneurial essence that gave the success to the venture.</p>
<p><strong>The back of a napkin</strong></p>
<p>Great ideas are often captured on a napkin, on one page. We need to find ways where that initial capture of a great idea, of a real reason for instance on why ‘we’ should combine forces, needs some capturing mechanism.</p>
<p>The concept of the one page canvas can be the place to paint our vision but in a structured way and the initial meeting place for innovation to come alive for all those that choose to go there.</p>
<p>A road map that ‘speaks’ of growth, of differentiation, of operational and execution excellence and customer potential/ acceptance as the necessary building blocks, of how to achieve it, so others can ‘see it’, challenge or improve upon it because they are “speaking the same language.”</p>
<p>By the way check this out: the Napkin Academy on <a href="http://bit.ly/HrYhKX">http://bit.ly/HrYhKX</a></p>
<p><strong>The pressing need is in finding a different ways to talk a common language.</strong></p>
<p>If we do want to move beyond our past ways to manage, top down, bottom up, we need to engage far more people, across a far more diverse marketplace of interested parties. We need to draw them in, to seek their participatation and understanding, within our innovation canvas design, so we are all on this same page.</p>
<p>We might want to extend the concept of the canvas across the business in even more novel designs than the Business model canvas so we can quickly sketch, to discuss and to listen to all those who chose to want to engage, who equally want to share and seek out fresh opportunity.</p>
<p>Innovation might be made of many things intangible but it can be captured. We need to allow it to be seen, just like those first ‘green shoots, so it can be nurtured, improved upon and fully shared in common understanding.</p>
<p>Just like spring, we need to ‘trigger all our senses’ for the need to grow, to talk to each other in a common language and appreciate how we are going to ‘set about’ innovation by achieving this new growth that can only be really achieved in a different way of shared understanding.</p><p>The post <a href="https://thinking4innovators.com/a-no-better-moment/">A No Better Moment</a> first appeared on <a href="https://thinking4innovators.com">Building Your Innovation & Ecosystem Intelligence</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2949</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
