<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Shining a powerful innovation light into the Corporate Boardrooms	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thinking4innovators.com/shining-a-powerful-innovation-light-into-the-corporate-boardrooms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thinking4innovators.com/shining-a-powerful-innovation-light-into-the-corporate-boardrooms/</link>
	<description>Bringing my thinking and solutions to your business problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Future Innovation demands a different approach &#124; Paul4innovating&#039;s Innovation Views		</title>
		<link>https://thinking4innovators.com/shining-a-powerful-innovation-light-into-the-corporate-boardrooms/#comment-1639</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Future Innovation demands a different approach &#124; Paul4innovating&#039;s Innovation Views]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paul4innovating.com/?p=12280#comment-1639</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] initially wrote in &#8220;Shining a powerful innovation light into the Corporate board rooms&#8221; about the application and value of this frame differently. The difference is that mine is an [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] initially wrote in &#8220;Shining a powerful innovation light into the Corporate board rooms&#8221; about the application and value of this frame differently. The difference is that mine is an [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill Van Eron		</title>
		<link>https://thinking4innovators.com/shining-a-powerful-innovation-light-into-the-corporate-boardrooms/#comment-1638</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Van Eron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 04:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paul4innovating.com/?p=12280#comment-1638</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Paul, I really enjoyed your post and plan  to read more of your work. Like you, I did a deep dive during a two year sabbatical so as to better understand all the factors driving change and the impacts on business. I never intended it to be two years but so much was changing I stayed enthralled as I read 8 books and about 20 reports by Gartner, Deloitte, Aberdeen and others. My background in innovation comes  from a career in design and marketing that I extended across PR and sales, R&#038;D and service and very rare experience within HP and Agilent as a lone force to challenge the status quo while earning trust and delivering ROI from 4X to 15X expectations. When I pushed HP to increase the value of its brand, I was told the brand strategy was geared to protect itself from poor implementation,  rather than to enable brand  experts like myself to help it fly. Yeah $100M minimally in one year to $7B also in one year was what I returned with no exceptions yet the engineering culture took it for granted. Most technology companies suffer the same gaps today.. Every time I went to a boss who was an engineer, they said &quot;it&#039;s your job on the line, if you believe in it, do it&quot; . I suspect that is what you see - even  worse - in the boardrooms as most find what got them here has no bearing on  what it takes to move forward. Some take that personally and resist change as a threat.

I believe tighter correlations can be made between innovation and profitable growth yet I also know why many innovation efforts fail. Startups show between  a 20-30% success rate and intrapreneurial efforts in large companies also seem to have a high fail rate.

I have been looking to help others who are innovation advisors as the problem is bigger than just innovation. You already figured out it is leadership and even  more conservative boardrooms.  This last December Gallup announced that 77% of US workers (87% internationally) are emotionally detached from work and they do not feel their ideas are listened to.  Ironically, three months later Gartner announced that CEO&#039;s are ranking inclusion as their top need. Employees want to be heard and part of the planning process. Organizations with disgruntled employees are the walking dead as no way will customers ever be satisfied.

I see marketing as being in the best position - not as it has been practiced  but my view of it is as a catalyst to organization alignment, buy in, customer centricity and innovation. People powered communities will only grow in power and influence. With total  transparency, companies any margin less than genuine will fail faster.

This is a time of unprecedented opportunity to create inclusion, a purpose that bonds people internally and externally, and integrated thinking (systems thinking and ecosystems thinking) are critical as there is no more pinpointing the problem.  There is a system that has to be understood, respected and regard earned. This is a time where humility is a strength as   leaders who have it are approachable. This is a human-centric revolution and those that resist and  hold on to false notions are the riskiest of all.

I pitch this as a time when stability will follow embracing the value economy sooner.
There are many types of innovation so I am constructing a perpetual innovation engine so more companies see opportunities that about 99% miss or are too slow to act on.

Look forward to reading more of your posts. Love  to chat someday. I also see a day where markets can proactively innovate where companies fail to.  Best, Bill Van  Eron.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul, I really enjoyed your post and plan  to read more of your work. Like you, I did a deep dive during a two year sabbatical so as to better understand all the factors driving change and the impacts on business. I never intended it to be two years but so much was changing I stayed enthralled as I read 8 books and about 20 reports by Gartner, Deloitte, Aberdeen and others. My background in innovation comes  from a career in design and marketing that I extended across PR and sales, R&amp;D and service and very rare experience within HP and Agilent as a lone force to challenge the status quo while earning trust and delivering ROI from 4X to 15X expectations. When I pushed HP to increase the value of its brand, I was told the brand strategy was geared to protect itself from poor implementation,  rather than to enable brand  experts like myself to help it fly. Yeah $100M minimally in one year to $7B also in one year was what I returned with no exceptions yet the engineering culture took it for granted. Most technology companies suffer the same gaps today.. Every time I went to a boss who was an engineer, they said &#8220;it&#8217;s your job on the line, if you believe in it, do it&#8221; . I suspect that is what you see &#8211; even  worse &#8211; in the boardrooms as most find what got them here has no bearing on  what it takes to move forward. Some take that personally and resist change as a threat.</p>
<p>I believe tighter correlations can be made between innovation and profitable growth yet I also know why many innovation efforts fail. Startups show between  a 20-30% success rate and intrapreneurial efforts in large companies also seem to have a high fail rate.</p>
<p>I have been looking to help others who are innovation advisors as the problem is bigger than just innovation. You already figured out it is leadership and even  more conservative boardrooms.  This last December Gallup announced that 77% of US workers (87% internationally) are emotionally detached from work and they do not feel their ideas are listened to.  Ironically, three months later Gartner announced that CEO&#8217;s are ranking inclusion as their top need. Employees want to be heard and part of the planning process. Organizations with disgruntled employees are the walking dead as no way will customers ever be satisfied.</p>
<p>I see marketing as being in the best position &#8211; not as it has been practiced  but my view of it is as a catalyst to organization alignment, buy in, customer centricity and innovation. People powered communities will only grow in power and influence. With total  transparency, companies any margin less than genuine will fail faster.</p>
<p>This is a time of unprecedented opportunity to create inclusion, a purpose that bonds people internally and externally, and integrated thinking (systems thinking and ecosystems thinking) are critical as there is no more pinpointing the problem.  There is a system that has to be understood, respected and regard earned. This is a time where humility is a strength as   leaders who have it are approachable. This is a human-centric revolution and those that resist and  hold on to false notions are the riskiest of all.</p>
<p>I pitch this as a time when stability will follow embracing the value economy sooner.<br />
There are many types of innovation so I am constructing a perpetual innovation engine so more companies see opportunities that about 99% miss or are too slow to act on.</p>
<p>Look forward to reading more of your posts. Love  to chat someday. I also see a day where markets can proactively innovate where companies fail to.  Best, Bill Van  Eron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
